Search
Close this search box.
Please enter CoinGecko Free Api Key to get this plugin works.

US Federal Trade Commission Investigates Marketing Schemes of Crypto Firm Voyager – Bitcoin News

In keeping with a court docket doc filed not too long ago within the Voyager Digital chapter case, the U.S. Federal Commerce Fee (FTC) is investigating the advertising and marketing of the crypto agency. Just like the U.S. Securities and Trade Fee (SEC), the FTC has objected to Binance US buying Voyager’s belongings.

FTC’s Objection to Voyager’s Proposed Sale Plan May Affect Chapter

In a submitting in chapter court docket registered on Feb. 22, 2023, the U.S. Federal Commerce Fee (FTC) detailed that it’s investigating the advertising and marketing schemes of the crypto agency Voyager Digital. “The FTC has commenced an investigation into sure acts and practices of [Voyager] and [the] debtors’ staff, administrators, and officers, for his or her misleading and unfair advertising and marketing of cryptocurrency to the general public,” the criticism explains.

The FTC submitting says the proposed sale of the debtor’s belongings would intrude with the present probe, which might basically discharge Voyager and particular employees members from alleged “fraud-related money owed held by a governmental unit.” The FTC shouldn’t be the one authorities company investigating Voyager. Texas’s securities regulator and legal professional basic objected to FTX buying Voyager previous to FTX’s collapse.

The Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) objected to the proposed acquisition by Binance US. Regardless of the objection, Voyager acquired court docket approval to proceed with the sale. Voyager’s authorized illustration, Allyson Smith of Kirkland & Ellis, informed the court docket the sale is “on observe” to proceed. “We’re on observe and don’t anticipate any obstacles,” Voyager’s lawyer harassed. Nevertheless, the newest submitting by the FTC insists that the debtors are “not entitled to a discharge right here.”

“Additional, even when debtors have been entitled to a discharge (by means of operation of consensual releases, for instance), the code particularly precludes the discharge of fraud-related money owed held by a governmental unit,” the FTC’s objection concludes. “Wherefore, for the foregoing causes, the FTC respectfully requests the court docket deny affirmation of the debtors’ proposed plan; strike Part VIII.B and D of the proposed plan; or grant every other reduction the Courtroom deems simply and correct.”

Tags on this story
Legal professional Common, Chapter, Binance.us, Code, affirmation, consensual releases, Courtroom, Cryptocurrency, Cryptocurrency regulation, misleading, discharge, fraud-related money owed, ftc, ftx, governmental unit, Investigation, Kirkland & Ellis, authorized illustration, advertising and marketing schemes, objection, proposed plan, Aid, sale, SEC, Workers Members, Texas securities regulator, US Federal Commerce Fee, Voyager chapter, Voyager Digital

What do you concentrate on the Federal Commerce Fee saying it’s investigating Voyager Digital’s advertising and marketing practices? Tell us what you concentrate on this topic within the feedback part under.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the Information Lead at Bitcoin.com Information and a monetary tech journalist residing in Florida. Redman has been an lively member of the cryptocurrency neighborhood since 2011. He has a ardour for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized functions. Since September 2015, Redman has written greater than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com Information in regards to the disruptive protocols rising immediately.




Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It’s not a direct supply or solicitation of a proposal to purchase or promote, or a suggestion or endorsement of any merchandise, companies, or corporations. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the creator is accountable, straight or not directly, for any injury or loss precipitated or alleged to be brought on by or in reference to using or reliance on any content material, items or companies talked about on this article.