That is an opinion editorial by BitcoinActuary, an actuary based mostly within the U.Ok.
I’ve lately returned from spending an extended weekend with round 200,000 others at one of many loves of my life, Glastonbury Pageant. The 2023 model of this annual music pageant was peppered with units from massive title acts — Elton John, Weapons N’ Roses and Foo Fighters, to call a couple of — however the inevitable media give attention to these tends to mislead these viewing it from the skin. Glastonbury is a phenomenon of huge scale; it could possibly be described as 10 festivals wrapped into one. Almost everybody who goes will let you know they’ve had a good time, however most likely all for various causes.
So, what hyperlinks Glastonbury with Bitcoin? Some cursory analysis and my very own journeys to the pageant in recent times recommend that only a few have ever made a hyperlink in any respect, barring this typically-scathing Guardian effort from a few years again.
Certainly, many most likely see the 2 as polar opposites. Glastonbury is famously left wing — there stays the Left Area tent, which homes talks and debates by activists and union members, led by the ever-present, “broadly leftist” Billy Bragg. The pyramid stage discipline featured grass coloring this year to display the giant message: “We Stand With The NHS” in assist of the U.Ok.’s Nationwide Well being Service.
Bitcoin, against this, is usually characterised as a know-how that appeals to the suitable wing. David Golumbia went about so far as it’s doable to go in his 2016 guide “The Politics Of Bitcoin: Software program As Proper-Wing Extremism.”
Secondly, the pageant is environmentally aware and has lengthy supported Greenpeace. In contrast, Bitcoin is continually criticized for its supposedly-wasteful power use. Greenpeace’s U.S. arm has been liable for its infamously poor “change the code, not the climate” marketing campaign towards Bitcoin, funded to the tune of $5 million by Ripple’s Chris Larson.
However are Glastonbury and Bitcoin actually irreconcilable? Under no circumstances.
Firstly, on the political entrance, Bitcoin itself is definitely apolitical. It’s a algorithm with out rulers. Anybody who makes an attempt to argue in any other case tends to mischaracterize it, and sometimes depends on typecasting the typical Bitcoiner as proper wing. In response, I’d encourage readers to take a longer-term have a look at financial historical past, and to ask the likes of Golumbia what it’s about this open-source, universally-accessible, elective, non-coercive protocol that’s so detestable. The neatest shortcut response to this hypothetical comes from Natalie Smolenski: “Being an enemy of a know-how is a reasonably dumb option to waste your time since you’re not answerable for whether or not a know-how is adopted at any significant scale.”
Furthermore, these from the “progressive” finish of the political spectrum are starting to make their voices heard and present that Bitcoin has common attraction. Reminder: Bitcoin is for enemies.
Onto Bitcoin’s environmental influence. As argued right here and right here, all will not be what it initially appears when evaluating Bitcoin’s ongoing power use. In actuality, Bitcoin is working with ever-increasing effectivity and it drives behavioral change by decreasing an people time choice, which could be a very important step in lowering the rampant and wasteful consumerism that we see on the earth immediately.
In abstract, on each the political and environmental fronts, Bitcoin and Glastonbury should not the polar opposites that many would assume. There are commonalities, too. Each swimsuit a libertarian outlook. Every has one-word model recognition. Each would seem to promote themselves — Bitcoin, after all, has seen explosive development with no formal advertising division, whereas Glastonbury tickets over the earlier decade have typically offered out in lower than an hour and round eight months earlier than the occasion is definitely held. Bitcoin has memes, Glastonbury has memes on flags.
So, how may Glastonbury embrace Bitcoin?
This previous 12 months, it was putting simply what number of funds have been being made by card versus only some years earlier, when money reigned supreme. With many small retailers on the pageant, it might massively scale back charges of anyplace between 1.5% and three.5% at the moment levied on each buy, by embracing Bitcoin’s Lightning Community as an added fee choice. Within the U.Ok., I’d recommend trying out the superb work finished by CoinCorner and Bridge2Bitcoin in driving ahead the Lightning Community as a low-cost fee mechanism for retailers.
As well as, bitcoin might signify a pure, long-term treasury reserve asset for Glastonbury — a long-term holding in bitcoin might assist journey out any tough instances in future. Certainly, the pageant isn’t any stranger to the pernicious nature of inflation: Ticket costs have been £105 in 2003 and had elevated to £335 in 2023, which little question displays the numerous will increase in prices confronted.
Glastonbury have lengthy been forward of the curve in making sweeping adjustments forward of others. In 2007, it eradicated ticket touts and scalpers in a single fell swoop by together with pageant goers’ pictures on tickets. In 2019, it banned single-use plastic bottles totally from the positioning, and in 2023, round 22,000 tickets have been offered particularly for pageant goers touring by bus. Would possibly it additionally get forward of the curve in embracing Bitcoin?
Admittedly, most likely not, based mostly on any present proof. However I might say to Michael and Emily Eavis, the organizers of the occasion: Dig a bit deeper than the present, skewed output on show from mainstream publications within the U.Ok. There’s far more to Bitcoin than first meets the attention.
Michael Eavis confirmed on this 12 months’s pageant program that the native council has now issued a license for them to carry the pageant in perpetuity. This should really feel notably candy, given his struggles with them over time. For Glastonbury, it appears, there’ll at all times be one other 12 months. And so too for Bitcoin.
This can be a visitor publish by BitcoinActuary. Opinions expressed are totally their very own and don’t essentially mirror these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.