The European Central Financial institution has raised alarm over President Donald Trump’s pro-crypto agenda, warning {that a} wave of dollar-backed stablecoins may threaten monetary stability throughout the eurozone and overwhelm the EU’s new crypto regulatory framework.
In a confidential coverage paper obtained by Politico, the ECB urged the European Fee to revisit the Markets in Crypto Belongings Regulation (MiCA), expressing considerations that the present guidelines could also be too lenient to counteract the consequences of aggressive US crypto reforms.
The reforms embrace two proposed legal guidelines, the STABLE and GENIUS acts, which analysts at Normal Chartered forecast may push dollar-backed stablecoin provide to $2 trillion by 2028, up from round $240 billion at the moment.
Fears of “contagion”
MiCA, which took impact earlier this yr, was heralded because the world’s first complete crypto regulation. Nevertheless, the ECB now argues that it might be inadequate to guard the EU from the spillover of a quickly increasing US stablecoin sector.
ECB President Christine Lagarde and digital funds chief Piero Cipollone have each voiced considerations that the rise of US-backed stablecoins may set off a shift in financial savings from euros to {dollars}, probably undermining EU financial sovereignty and exposing European banks to redemption dangers.
The central financial institution’s paper particularly criticized MiCA’s allowances for “multi-issuance” constructions, the place EU-based issuers can companion with international corporations to develop stablecoin distribution.
It warned that such frameworks may allow dollar-backed tokens to dominate EU markets, creating what it described as an “oligopolistic” construction favoring non-EU issuers and growing European publicity to US Treasury debt.
Fee defends current regulation
The European Fee strongly disputed the ECB’s stance, asserting in its personal paper that the central financial institution had misinterpreted MiCA.
In accordance with the report, Fee officers argued that the regulation already consists of provisions to mitigate the dangers posed by foreign-backed stablecoins and emphasised that crypto corporations should meet strict necessities to function throughout the EU.
The EC stated in its rebuttal:
“The dangers arising from such international stablecoins appear to be overstated and are manageable beneath the present authorized framework.”
It pointed to profitable enforcement actions, resembling Tether’s (USDT) delisting from some exchanges, as proof of the regulation’s effectiveness.
The Fee additionally highlighted that just one international stablecoin had been accepted beneath MiCA to date, and that the ECB retains the authority to dam tokens that threaten the steadiness of fee techniques or financial coverage.
Regardless of the disagreement, each establishments agree on the significance of rigorous enforcement and acknowledge the geopolitical implications of the US administration’s efforts to internationalize the greenback by crypto innovation.
The strain highlights the broader strategic anxiousness throughout the EU over its monetary independence, as Trump’s crypto-friendly insurance policies achieve traction and digital {dollars} proceed to seek out use in unstable economies overseas.